本來打算待 The Pacific 出DVD後才一次過看的,但較早前看過以下這個頗具爭議性的訪問,當HBO台一開始播,我就按捺不住,逐集開始追,唔追尤是可,一追十集,上個週末,終大功告成。
是這樣的,今年3月號的TIME Magazine,就當時即將播放
After hearing about today's AT&T data plan pricing changes , I had a pretty bad gut reaction. After thinking more about the new options, I don't quite not what to think...
The new data plans are as follows:
Data Plus - 200 MB of data for $15/month. Additional 200MB for another $15.
DataPro - 2GB of data for $25/month. Additional 1 GB of data for $10.

import java.io.File;import java.io.FileInputStream;import java.io.FileOutputStream;import java.io.IOException;import java.util.zip.ZipEntry;import java.util.zip.ZipInputStream;
public static void decompress(File source, File destination) throws IOException{ if (!destination.exists() || destination.isDirectory()){ destination.mkdirs(); ZipInputStream zis = new ZipInputStream(new FileInputStream(source)); byte[] bufferimport java.io.File;import java.io.FileInputStream;import java.io.FileOutputStream;import java.io.IOException;import java.util.zip.Deflater;import java.util.zip.ZipEntry;import java.util.zip.ZipOutputStream;
public static void compress(File source, File destination) throws IOException{ compress(source, destination, null, Deflater.DEFAULT_COMPRESSION);}public static void compress(File source, File destination, String comment, intToday's missing ZFS feature is most easily described by telling youabout the problem. Suppose that you have a redundant pool (okay, aredundant vdev) and one of the disks in it develops some bad sectorsthat can't be read. My current understanding is that this is not a'replace disk immediately' sign the way that write errors are, andthus can happen on otherwise healthy and usable disks.
(A persistent write error is a 'replace disk immediately' sign becauseit means that the
本來打算待 The Pacific 出DVD後才一次過看的,但較早前看過以下這個頗具爭議性的訪問,當HBO台一開始播,我就按捺不住,逐集開始追,唔追尤是可,一追十集,上個週末,終大功告成。
是這樣的,今年3月號的TIME Magazine,就當時即將播放
I have a confession: every so often, Twitter irritates me. To be honest,there's a bunch of sources of this specific irritation besides Twitter,but Twitter is the most frequent one.
The irritation is that Twitter effectively hides information on who islinking to WanderingThoughts entries. In most linking and re-bloggingenvironments, some amount of this information shows up in the Refererheaders of incoming HTTP requests. Even if the Referer URL doesn't giveyou the exact entry where someone linked to you, it