本來以為要說都說了,應該暫告一段落,但最近發現有人搞混亂了一些事情,有些人以為:「只要那個 Blog 有 Creative Commons 授權,就可以引用了,否則就不可以」。
這是個錯誤的觀點。
首先要明白,我們所討論的字眼,就一篇文章來說:
- 引
本來以為要說都說了,應該暫告一段落,但最近發現有人搞混亂了一些事情,有些人以為:「只要那個 Blog 有 Creative Commons 授權,就可以引用了,否則就不可以」。
這是個錯誤的觀點。
首先要明白,我們所討論的字眼,就一篇文章來說:
The iostat manpage documents %iowait as:
Show the percentage of time that the CPU or CPUs were idle duringwhich the system had an outstanding disk I/O request.
It turns out that the manpage is wrong, which I found out by reading thekernel source because I was curious about what exactly it measured.
The actual definition of %iowait is the percentage of the time thatthe system was idle and at least one process was waiting for disk IO tofinish . (This is true for both the 2.
留意到有甚麼錯?
答案:女友告訴我,你常常將「根本」寫成「跟本」。
一搜之下,果然有十多篇都在寫「跟本」啊,趕忙修正!嘿嘿,已經消去所有證據了!
可能我太習慣寫/打「跟」本,所以根本就沒有發覺自己打了白字。
上個星期收到「流量達到 80%」的自動警告電郵,查看一下,原來 5GB 的流量就來到頂了。接觸過寄存公司後,臨時加了 1GB 的流量以解燃眉之急,即 6GB。而今天計,seezone.net 的總流量是 5.1GB,而小 Blog 則佔了 3.8GB,即

People are social. We like to show off, to talk, to be heard, and byextension to share. There's every sign that "look at me" is a corehuman drive, along with its kissing cousin "look at this".
This sounds like an obvious thing, but then a number of people turnaround and wonder why there are so many people using LiveJournal (and ina prior era, making homepages on GeoCities). The former explains thelatter: we blog because people look
Blog
討論風氣