
Mozilla 常有新點子。早些日子 (也真是相當早了…),他們介紹了 的概念,想將一些經常做的動作化為語言般的指令,直接將 URL 欄當成指令輸入的地方。感覺上就好像將 搬上 URL 欄,但玩過他們做的 ,感覺又有些不一樣。
在那個 Mockup 裏,

Mozilla 常有新點子。早些日子 (也真是相當早了…),他們介紹了 的概念,想將一些經常做的動作化為語言般的指令,直接將 URL 欄當成指令輸入的地方。感覺上就好像將 搬上 URL 欄,但玩過他們做的 ,感覺又有些不一樣。
在那個 Mockup 裏,
Since I keep rediscovering this every so often, here's what I know aboutrewrite rules in .htaccess files so that I can just read it here thenext time around.
Some basics:
RewriteEngine on ' statement, even if the rewrite engineis already on in the main configuration. RewriteRule are relative tothe directory the .htaccess is in. However, Apache variables like %{REQUEST_FILENAME} that you use in RewriteCond are the full的主題是「宅之前傳」,談的是老一代香港互聯網,也就是那些 BBS , Usergroup 年代的事。看歷史能知發展,也能與當今作個對比。
不難看到是次主講主要分為兩類人:討論社群用家 (港娛, hkdays, HKiBBS) 和流動裝置用家 (Newton, pda, palm)。早

At one level, the difference between online backups and offline backupsis that online backups are, well, online; you can make them and get atthem without having to load tapes (or hard drives ),connect your external USB hard drive, or whatever. There are twoadvantages of online backups; they involve little or no physicalshuffling around of things, and they make for very rapid restores ofdata.
These advantages should not be understated. It's much easier to automateyour backups and make sure that
Unix has a slightly odd way of handling file access permissions, inthat they're only checked when a file is opened, not every time thatyou attempt to do something with the file handle. While the choice isdefensible, in many ways checking permissions on access would be moreconvenient, since it would enable things like immediately revokingaccess to files, and very few programs actually care about this.
(And these days, it would fit better into network filesystems, manyof which operate this way anyways.)