瀏覽器大戰,走的方向都是以運行 Web Application 為主,所以大力加重 Javascript 的效能改進,得益的自然是一般用戶。可是,我想即使是現在,仍然有很多開發工作要以 IE6 為對象。IE6 除了超多 CSS 臭蟲 外,Javascript Engine 的漏水 (記憶) 情況也是很嚴重。
不稱之哀
Tom Sawyer
When we look hard enough, we can find ourselves symptomatic of what Tom Sawyer had demonstrated as a professional trickster. This condition is highly contagious, I guarantee, and not easily reversed.
It's all very well for those of us who make mistakes now and then, like what Tom Sawyer did most of the time. And it's nice
一念
IE8 InPrivate 威脅 Google 業務?
Google Chrome 推出,大多新聞都認為這是用來挑戰 IE 的。當中大都會提到一個論點:IE8 Beta 2 內附的保安功能,令 Google 無法追踪用戶的上網行為和使用習慣,威脅到 Google 的搜尋和廣告業務。
InPrivate Browsing 本身並沒有甚麼特別,只是會在結束瀏覽時幫你
got video too...
How to reject at SMTP time without enabling dictionary scanning
One claimed problem with rejecting unknown local addresses at SMTPtime is that it enables a spammer to do a cheap dictionary scan ofyour domain to find valid usernames; all they have to do is try abunch of RCPT TO s and see which ones get accepted (or don't get apermanent failure). The easiest way around this is simple: just do yourgreylisting before you give permanent rejections.
This doesn't completely block dictionary scanning (or other versions ofaddress scanning), but it does force
Why SMTP needs a way of communicating partial success for message delivery
As illustrated in yesterday's entry , one of the problems of the (E)SMTPprotocol is that after a SMTP server has accepted all of the message'sdestination addresses and gets to see the actual message, it has noway to tell the client that the message was delivered to only some ofthose addresses. This decision made perfect sense at the time thatSMTP and then ESMTP were being created, because back then most of theplausible per-address problems could be detected at RCPT TO timeand if
20080903 網摘 – Google 瀏覽器
Blog
- 網友——-新部落時代的來臨 Quote: 最后,我们都成了不同俱乐部的“网友”,看不见“公共”的存在,却肯定各自真理的终极,和部落没什么两样
- 我寫部落格,我希望被認同,但不代表我很虛榮或愛錢 Quote: 對於許多人來講,這