Discussions about Solaris often wind up bringing up OpenSolaris (andsometimes it crops up in other contexts). However, I do not findOpenSolaris particularly interesting.
My view is that right now, OpenSolaris is essentially a technologydemonstrator. You can't use OpenSolaris by itself, because it lackssufficient support to use it directly and sufficient genuine opennessfor sensible people to base stable things on it. You can't use it as thefuture of Solaris, because I'm not aware of any commitment from Sun that
Protection for Gangs, Clubs and Nations Causing Grief In Human Relations It’s A Turf War On A Global Scale I’d Rather Hear Both Sides Of The Tale See, It’s Not About Races Just Places Faces Where Your Blood Comes From Is Where Your Space Is I’ve Seen The Bright Get Duller I’m Not Going To Spend My Life Being A Color
~from Michael Jackson’s “Black or White”
高鐵熱燙燙，我的網圈內大都是反對
Some brief followups from my first entry on this.
First, the mismatch_cnt numbers are reset from scratch everytime you re-run a check (and probably every time there is a mirrorresync). On many current systems, this means that they will be resetevery week. This makes sense and is even implied by the documentation (in the usual Unixfashion of reading between the lines),but it would have been nice to have it explicitly documented.
(I'm aware that I'm
產品設計我不在行，只知道一件產品的成功與否，能夠吸引到那類型的消費者，基本上，先不談功能，一件產品的form factor其實已主宰了它一半的命運。
看看以下圖片，你猜這是什麼。
這明顯是一個類似車頭燈的物體，對不？
再來個
I like Unix, but I'm not entirely happy with the modern world of Unix,and not for the reason you might expect. Instead of disliking thechanges from the old days, I find it distressing to see Unix slowlyfossilize.
Unix should be picking up new good ideas. It should be adopting betterways of writing shell scripts, adding more little programs,and all of that. Yes, things like seq and (GNU) stat and (GNU) date and time are not in the Posix specification