今天在 Coding Horror 看到這麼一條看似簡單的問題,但想了好一陣子才明白真正答案的意思,也給大家玩玩。
某人有兩孩子,其一為女,那其育有一男一女的機率為何?
答案就在該篇文章裏,又或可看 Boy or Girl paradox 。
今天在 Coding Horror 看到這麼一條看似簡單的問題,但想了好一陣子才明白真正答案的意思,也給大家玩玩。
某人有兩孩子,其一為女,那其育有一男一女的機率為何?
答案就在該篇文章裏,又或可看 Boy or Girl paradox 。
Despite what I wrote yesterday and my general viewson authenticating SSL , I thinkthat in real life SSL still needs certificate authorities, or at leastsome sort of trust roots. The problem is that normal people are simplynot interested in assessing trust issues and probably are not capable ofdoing so. In fact I'm not sure that I'm capable of doing it.
(As I wrote once before, in practice I make no attempt to actuallyverify the SSH host keys that I get prompted to approve,
各位新年快樂!整理一下 2008 年看過的戲:
Jan
Feb
Mar
One alternative to monolithic certificate authorities is a web oftrust approach to trustissues. Here's my view of the flaws this model as an alternative toCAs, when used in practice.
First, you haven't actually removed the need to pick trust roots; everyuser has to start their web somewhere, and usually they are going tostart from some well-known root or roots. What you have really doneis made trust roots less subject to detailed scrutiny and criticism,and probably made it less obvious
Here is a thesis that I have been mulling over lately:
One of Python 3's fundamental problems is that it is trying very hardto pretend that Unix is fundamentally a Unicode operating system, sothat Python itself can be Unicode-based while still working on Unix. Theproblem with this is that it is demonstrably false, as seen in the os.listdir() problem ; Unix is fundamentally a'bytecode strings' environment, and attempts to pretend otherwise canrun into problems any time that this pretense runs