一直以為明信片會式微的。就算不是消失，至少也會淪為陪襯品，只應該是孤單地瑟縮在機場小商舖或是巿區書店的一角，等待有心人來消費完最後一疊，然後成為集體回憶。
實在有太多理由不去買明信片了，試想像一個人忽然
點解做網絡營銷會做到上飛機頭等艙飲靚酒嘆大餐？(一)
新西蘭航空是我們公司剛拿到的新客戶，由於航空公司本身的網頁改條頭髮也要大事周章，於是我們便建議客戶索性到Facebook自立門戶，開個群組。
但不要新西蘭航空會一味硬銷減價機票旅行套餐，查實我們會先在那裡做Brand Engagement，為粉
點解做網絡營銷會做到上飛機頭等艙飲靚酒嘆大餐？(二)
先來一個冷盤，烤大蝦配五香醬，配甜薯、希臘軟芝士及鮮番茄沙律。我笑問靚仔星廚是否只有頭等艙才有如此爽口的大蝦，他政治正確地答：經濟艙的客人都可以享受到味美的蝦沙律，只是蝦的size不同而已，但各有各美味特色
抑鬱症仙丹
「百忍」未必可以「成金」，但就肯定好傷身。我經常鼓勵大家不要忍，有什麼不滿即管發洩出來。Of course，年紀較大的要小心爆血管，但發脾氣至少不會谷到抑鬱，對心理生絕對有利。Well，最多只會搞到身邊的人抑鬱吧！
唉，
唉，
Are security bugs always code bugs?
I'll be generous and ask the slightly broader question: are security'bugs' always caused by code bugs? I believe that the answer clearlyhas to be no; while there's a decent argument that failure to properlyescape input is a code bug, I think it stretches the term beyondall non-circular meaning to say that using the wrong cryptography is a code bug.
I think that there are at least the following sources of securitybugs:
- outright code bugs, the traditional off by one errors
XHTML vs HTML5
Every so often these days, an XHTML fanatic goes off on a rant abouthow HTML5 is all a horrible mistake and a nightmare ( this one is abouttypical for the breed, and is what set me off in turn). These people arecommitting a simple mistake: they misunderstand the nature of the world.
It's really simple; XHTML and HTML5 are entirely different sorts ofstandards . XHTML is an invented standardand has failed because it had very high costs of implementationand use and provided almost
Lady First 專欄（63）－ 後悔
點解，上帝創造人嘅時候，要創造埋七情六慾俾我哋呢？又或者，點解唔創造一個只識開心快樂，唔識傷心失望嘅人類出嚟呢？
如果係咁，個世界會唔會變得比宜家美好？我哋嘅日子又會唔會比宜家過得更好？
喺咁多種情緒裡面
如果係咁，個世界會唔會變得比宜家美好？我哋嘅日子又會唔會比宜家過得更好？
喺咁多種情緒裡面
重拍《下女》?
【明報專訊】康城影后全度妍 今年初為人母，產後專心相夫湊女，經過大半年休養生息後，最近終於宣業布復工大計，回歸影壇首部作品，正是 重拍1960年已故導演金錡泳的名片《下女》 ，當年被喻為「韓國電影的教科書」