
去看《地球停轉日》前早有心理準備,加上人們以《強戰世界》相比之,所以心中大概有個底蘊。結果不負所望,故事意念其實不差,但說故事說得差。明顯偏重於特技場口,使得主要情節反欠缺說服力。
Spoiler Alert!
戲中外星人 Klaatu 代
Here is something that is intuitively clear to me but I am finding hardto explain coherently:
In order to really push an issue, to really get people to care aboutit, you need to have a major advantage to offer in it.
Here is an example of what I mean:
Imagine that you want to improve boot times, and in fact you seefast boot times as both important for usability and a competitiveadvantage. However, most people don't care about boot times right now,or really notice

去看《地球停轉日》前早有心理準備,加上人們以《強戰世界》相比之,所以心中大概有個底蘊。結果不負所望,故事意念其實不差,但說故事說得差。明顯偏重於特技場口,使得主要情節反欠缺說服力。
Spoiler Alert!
戲中外星人 Klaatu 代
現場演出,孩子先生的演繹總有另一番的感人力量。
不是新歌了,已聽了兩三個月,但近日總喜歡在步行上班的路途上,將這首個歌在iPod中響起一遍,然後就頓感精神抖擻,充滿鬥志,在睛朗的一天出發。孩子先生,果然是勵志
Let me say it up front: managing a firewall of any decent complexityis hard. Sooner or later you start losing track of rules and what'sactually going on, writing half-redundant rules, and so on; inshort, your firewall ruleset descends into sysadmin superstition .I've recently realized that part of why this happens is that there arethree views of your firewall's behavior that you need, and you can't getall of them just from reading your firewall rules; at most
Just like users have folklore , system administrationdoes too. Our sort of superstition is a bit different, though ( well , usually ):it is the kind of thing where you say 'I don't know why that's there,but let's not remove it just in case'. When our system environmentsreach a certain level of fragile complexity and westart losing track of the fine details, of course our informed actionsstart descending into rote procedures.
(This really accelerates when new people come