六月三十日好鬼多野發生
Why I don't like inverted if conditionals
Perl has an often used feature where you can write a conditionalstatement in a form like:
statement if (condition);
(You can use unless too.)
I find this usage lurching because it's a dislocation in my flow ofthought. I start out reading the code thinking that the statement alwayshappens; then I get to the if and whoops, time to backtrack on myunderstanding.
The worst form of this is when the if is indented a lot, so it'salmost flush right with
七一的路。真想大哭一場。
| 到七一的路 陳滅 |
燭光那麼虛弱,火柴與手指的距離太短
沒有燒着什麼,還是一切都點燃了
那在我們背後沸騰的,一束湧動的光
播放着電影,搬演另一種生活
有炮火也有歌聲,吻、笑和別,淡入又淡出
但只有很少值得我們模仿,或
7.1街上見~
孤獨的存在
身體不知道
在港澳社會的主流“文化”中,攻擊人和奉承人時,焦點都離不開身體,社會習慣了以身材作為訕笑﹑詆毀﹑賣弄﹑評論的切入點,年輕人在這樣的文化氣氛下成
出了什麼問題?
一. 賺錢是人生第一要義,其他的事務都屬多餘;
二. 要著數,不要蝕底,執輸行頭慘過敗家,但同時要慎防走得太前,因為行先很可能會死先;
三
些微
嘉賓:陳惜姿
陳惜姿走路的姿態會令人想起「大搖大擺」,但細心一看,那其實是悠閒。她似乎真的不喜歡給定的東西,你問什麼她當場才答,認真地想。那種好奇心與隨時攤開自己讓未知進入的靈敏。

Why you can't use object.__new__ on everything
Here's an interesting error message, somewhat slimmed down:
>>> object.__new__(dict)
TypeError: object.__new__(dict) is not safe, use dict.__new__()
At first blush this seems a peculiar artificial limitation: object isthe root of the Python type hierarchy and thus its __new__ is theroot version of creating new objects, so why doesn't it work?
Like the last peculiarity this
空姐不想做空姐了
空姐每次踏入機艙,便開始掛念她的家人、她的朋友、她愛的人... ... 空姐一點都不愛香港,但她愛的人都在這裡,她甚麼地方都不想去。
空姐不想每天機械化地問:"Would you care for a drink?" "Would you care for chicken