漏水 IE

瀏覽器大戰,走的方向都是以運行 Web Application 為主,所以大力加重 Javascript 的效能改進,得益的自然是一般用戶。可是,我想即使是現在,仍然有很多開發工作要以 IE6 為對象。IE6 除了超多 CSS 臭蟲 外,Javascript Engine 的漏水 (記憶) 情況也是很嚴重。


不稱之哀

上屆奧運的金牌運動員來港表演,已經看得我一肚子火——我就是不能接受把運動員從整個他獲得榮譽的脈絡裡剝離出來,失去了緊張性的他們並不美麗。今年的情況更誇張,陳一冰脫衣已把我氣得倒噎,後來整個大球場什麼的

Tom Sawyer

I was amused to share The Adventures of Tom Sawyer with the son of my classmates last Sunday. The story is almost funny – except that it's not.

When we look hard enough, we can find ourselves symptomatic of what Tom Sawyer had demonstrated as a professional trickster. This condition is highly contagious, I guarantee, and not easily reversed.

It's all very well for those of us who make mistakes now and then, like what Tom Sawyer did most of the time. And it's nice

一念

無論遇到甚麼問題,姿態都是重要的。初出茅廬時,遇到任何事都大驚小怪,長了些年紀,自然學會處變不驚,並不是的“不驚”,而是知道驚也沒有用,太陽底下無新事,一切不過是歷史重演,只是有時我們有幸置身事外,

IE8 InPrivate 威脅 Google 業務?

Google Chrome 推出,大多新聞都認為這是用來挑戰 IE 的。當中大都會提到一個論點:IE8 Beta 2 內附的保安功能,令 Google 無法追踪用戶的上網行為和使用習慣,威脅到 Google 的搜尋和廣告業務。

InPrivate Browsing 本身並沒有甚麼特別,只是會在結束瀏覽時幫你


got video too...

https://tv.on.cc/index.html?s=4&i=OEN080730-11049-401M-G05&d=1220370901

無言感激


感謝所有記得今天的朋友

感謝送禮物的朋友

感謝想令我開心的人


How to reject at SMTP time without enabling dictionary scanning

One claimed problem with rejecting unknown local addresses at SMTPtime is that it enables a spammer to do a cheap dictionary scan ofyour domain to find valid usernames; all they have to do is try abunch of RCPT TO s and see which ones get accepted (or don't get apermanent failure). The easiest way around this is simple: just do yourgreylisting before you give permanent rejections.

This doesn't completely block dictionary scanning (or other versions ofaddress scanning), but it does force


Why SMTP needs a way of communicating partial success for message delivery

As illustrated in yesterday's entry , one of the problems of the (E)SMTPprotocol is that after a SMTP server has accepted all of the message'sdestination addresses and gets to see the actual message, it has noway to tell the client that the message was delivered to only some ofthose addresses. This decision made perfect sense at the time thatSMTP and then ESMTP were being created, because back then most of theplausible per-address problems could be detected at RCPT TO timeand if


20080903 網摘 – Google 瀏覽器

Blog