Spam and the attraction of reach
Here is a thesis: the larger or more standardized the environmentfor sending messages, the more spam you should expect to get in orthrough it. Accordingly, email is heavily abused because it is hugelystandardized.
The spammer's motivation for abusing larger, standardized environmentsis obvious; the larger the environment, the more people you can reachwith a single technique, approach, or system. Larger environments havebetter return on effort, since generally (but not always) most of theeffort in spamming in an environment
妥協者
2010與2012
早前我在 Twitter 大概寫了這麼一句:「《2010》變成國片, 是否應該愛國一下?」想說的其實是《2012》,原因是聽說這片在國內暢通無阻,一刀不剪。不過碰巧地《2010》這作品其實也有中國的份兒。
《2010》是
The corollary for effective anti-spam heuristics
Last time I mentioned that spammers wereperfectly capable of adopting their practices to defeat anti-spamheuristics like requiring a valid EHLO or reverse DNS, and so suchheuristics were, if effective and widely adopted, at best a temporaryfix. This raises an obvious corollary about good anti-spam heuristics.
Since spammers will adopt when it is both useful and possible, a goodanti-spam heuristic is some characteristic of the message or of how itis transmitted that the spammer cannot easily change. While people havemade various
Universities are open environments
One of the things that's led to the university Internet environmentchanging (per an earlier entry ) is thatuniversities are open environments in general and especially in termsof services. In this they are fundamentally different from companies,which can be much more closed and closeted environments.
I think that there's three reasons for this. First, there is a muchdifferent relationship between many people at the university and theuniversity. In a company, everyone 'at' or 'in' the company is workingfor
這一個月
之前一套我沒有看過的電視劇,出了一句流行的說話,問「人生有幾多個十年」,意思不外乎說,人生苦短,該做的事就應該馬上做,不該做的事就不要浪費青春。相信沒有人會答「人生大約有七至十個