作為一名普通消費者,講真,當你比較過大部份的 Netbook 型 號之後,你會發覺在基本規格上, 無論其優點及死位都會是各有千秋。以我來說,作最後決定時, 通常會落在品牌信譽、外型和價格之上。
我都算是在一家 I.T. 公司上班
作為一名普通消費者,講真,當你比較過大部份的 Netbook 型 號之後,你會發覺在基本規格上, 無論其優點及死位都會是各有千秋。以我來說,作最後決定時, 通常會落在品牌信譽、外型和價格之上。
我都算是在一家 I.T. 公司上班

There's a certain perception that Fedora is the beta-quality testbedfor Red Hat Enterprise (to condense a comment from an earlier entry ), and this is why you shouldn't put it on anymachine you care about. This isn't the case, but I think people wind upwith this perception because they hear the accurate suggestion that youprobably shouldn't put it on servers or production machines unless youreally know what you're doing.
Fedora is supposed to be (and by and

想當年,時為1979年之唔係30年前,這部銀藍色的卡式帶Sony Walkman TPS-L2 ,試問邊個靚仔唔恨有番部?
我真希望Sony能夠復刻這部元祖Walkman,但要將她變成擁有和iPod功能一樣的MP3 Player,中間的卡式帶窗口變成LED mon,有餅卡式帶晌
In a previous entry I made an offhandcomment that diskless clients still needed a separate / filesystemfor each client. This is true for how diskless clients were generallyimplemented, but technically not true in general; it's possible to builda diskless client environment with even a shared root directory.
The truth is that most of the contents of / are common between allmachines; there is just not that much system-specific information inthe root filesystem, especially if your diskless machines were generic(which they usually were
