最近的 ,一些家長簡直將色情資訊視作毒品,好像一經接觸就會變成強姦犯一樣,如此邏輯,實在可笑也可悲。
我看這問題的角度是:現況如何?色情資訊是否令很多人變成色情狂強姦犯?有相關的統計資料嗎?現行規管又有沒
In thinking more about undo issues , I think that thefundamental misconception of designing an undo system is to think of itas purely operation based, instead of something more complex (I don'tthink that it's purely time based either). Undo is only operation basedover the very short term, where you are undo-ing an immediate mistake.
I've been trying to think about what things you do with undo, ingeneral. So far, what I have come up with is:
之 前 幾 期 提 到 男 人 要 追 女 仔 首 先 要 保 持 身 體 健 康 , 具 有 「 搵 食 」 必 要 技 能 , 表 現 自 信 魅 力 。 符 合 上 述 基 本 條 件 就 可 以 進 入 實 戰 階 段 。 有 目 標 方 可 追 , 而 鎖 定 目 標 就 是 第 一 步 。
我 之 前 已 說 過 很 多 遍 , 選 擇 一 個 錯 誤 的 對 象 , 是 難 以 修

Here is my growing theory: current versions of 'undo' functionalitygenerally aren't all that good. Having any undo is a lot better thannone, and having multi-level undo is a lot better than only a singlelevel of it (to the point where it's hard for me to consider singlelevel undo as 'undo' any more), but this is a long way from being reallyuseful.
(The problem with single-level undo are hopefully obvious: it's onlyuseful
最近的 ,一些家長簡直將色情資訊視作毒品,好像一經接觸就會變成強姦犯一樣,如此邏輯,實在可笑也可悲。
我看這問題的角度是:現況如何?色情資訊是否令很多人變成色情狂強姦犯?有相關的統計資料嗎?現行規管又有沒