Thinking about uses for (system) activity tracers
System activity tracers are a hot topic, with the best known one beingSun's DTrace. In thinking about this issue recently, I believe thatthere are three sorts of questions that they can be used to answer,or at least that I'm interested in having answered:
- what is my system doing?
Performance related tracing is one obvious subset of this, both inthe 'what is taking all the time' sense and in the 'how long doessome operation take' sense.
- why is my system
周日一個人在冠男軒飲早茶
在此立誓
文學旅遊驚喜
tonight..
5號,11號,7號,6號
最上鏡:
3號,4號
國際親善:
5號
改變
長短句
One consequence of Linux's dynamic network device naming
I knew that Linux did dynamic network device naming , but one consequence of that only really sunkin recently. Dynamic naming is relatively predictable for interfacesthat are always on (especially when various distributions work hard to make them verypersistent), but where it can really surprise you (and your software)is when the interfaces are dynamic. Like, say, PPP interfaces.
Just like Ethernet interfaces, the first active PPP connection gets ppp0 , the second one gets ppp1 , and so on. But unlike Ethernets
The advantage of blog comments
The advantage of having blog comments is that they are the easiest wayfor people to, well, make a comment on an entry. The main alternativeis email, but blog comments are significantly easier than email in this modern age of spam and other problems, where notonly is it difficult to find the blog author's email address (because ifit was easy to find the spammers would find it), but it's difficult toknow if you can trust them with your email address.
(While writing