當Mac仔繼續窒頭窒勢,咄咄逼人,PC就一於打親民牌,話今次Win7的所有升呢,條橋都唔關我事,全部都係所有街坊幫手諗o既,一反以往Microsoft以為自己高高在上啋你有味的高傲形象。
查實,我都有份報夢俾Steve Ballmer,叫佢咁改咁改o
當Mac仔繼續窒頭窒勢,咄咄逼人,PC就一於打親民牌,話今次Win7的所有升呢,條橋都唔關我事,全部都係所有街坊幫手諗o既,一反以往Microsoft以為自己高高在上啋你有味的高傲形象。
查實,我都有份報夢俾Steve Ballmer,叫佢咁改咁改o
先作個人利益申報(查實又無咩特別利益,因為我都係打工),NOKIA是我公司的客戶,上星趁新鮮滾熱辣,第一時間便問了客戶借來這款新機試玩,本文純屬個人分享,與工作無直接關係(因為我寫完都唔會有花紅分同人工加)。

新西蘭航空是我們公司剛拿到的新客戶,由於航空公司本身的網頁改條頭髮也要大事周章,於是我們便建議客戶索性到Facebook自立門戶,開個群組。
但不要新西蘭航空會一味硬銷減價機票旅行套餐,查實我們會先在那裡做Brand Engagement,為粉


先來一個冷盤,烤大蝦配五香醬,配甜薯、希臘軟芝士及鮮番茄沙律。我笑問靚仔星廚是否只有頭等艙才有如此爽口的大蝦,他政治正確地答:經濟艙的客人都可以享受到味美的蝦沙律,只是蝦的size不同而已,但各有各美味特色
I'll be generous and ask the slightly broader question: are security'bugs' always caused by code bugs? I believe that the answer clearlyhas to be no; while there's a decent argument that failure to properlyescape input is a code bug, I think it stretches the term beyondall non-circular meaning to say that using the wrong cryptography is a code bug.
I think that there are at least the following sources of securitybugs:
Every so often these days, an XHTML fanatic goes off on a rant abouthow HTML5 is all a horrible mistake and a nightmare ( this one is abouttypical for the breed, and is what set me off in turn). These people arecommitting a simple mistake: they misunderstand the nature of the world.
It's really simple; XHTML and HTML5 are entirely different sorts ofstandards . XHTML is an invented standardand has failed because it had very high costs of implementationand use and provided almost