(圖為 NewType 的新屋島作戰圖片)
最近在「順手」整理餘下的 EVA Zone 資料,現在的「解謎檔案」和「補完版」也已經搬遷完成了。新加了「更新消息」一項,主要用來放 Rebuild of Evangelion ( ROE ) 的更新消息。另外,新加了「作品介紹」,為 ROE 開了
(圖為 NewType 的新屋島作戰圖片)
最近在「順手」整理餘下的 EVA Zone 資料,現在的「解謎檔案」和「補完版」也已經搬遷完成了。新加了「更新消息」一項,主要用來放 Rebuild of Evangelion ( ROE ) 的更新消息。另外,新加了「作品介紹」,為 ROE 開了
Perl has an often used feature where you can write a conditionalstatement in a form like:
statement if (condition);
(You can use unless too.)
I find this usage lurching because it's a dislocation in my flow ofthought. I start out reading the code thinking that the statement alwayshappens; then I get to the if and whoops, time to backtrack on myunderstanding.
The worst form of this is when the if is indented a lot, so it'salmost flush right with
| 到七一的路 陳滅 |

Here's an interesting error message, somewhat slimmed down:
>>> object.__new__(dict)
TypeError: object.__new__(dict) is not safe, use dict.__new__()
At first blush this seems a peculiar artificial limitation: object isthe root of the Python type hierarchy and thus its __new__ is theroot version of creating new objects, so why doesn't it work?
Like the last peculiarity this