
最近看 Malcom Galdwin 的《Outliers》有一段我覺得很簡單地形容了本書要旨 (大意):
生物學家愛談「生態」:最高的橡樹之所以長得高,並非只因種子夠堅硬,也因為無樹遮光、泥土豐厚、無兔咬食、無人砍伐。我們皆知成功者種子堅實,但
Given that DWiki is template-based, in theory I could fix my commentform design mistake from yesterday. All I would haveto do is revise the 'write a comment' template that's used here so thatit included the entry and the existing comment, as well as a preview ofyour new comment and the comment entry form itself.
Except not so fast, because this revised version would be a usabilitydisaster as I've described it. The problem is that all of the links tothe '

最近看 Malcom Galdwin 的《Outliers》有一段我覺得很簡單地形容了本書要旨 (大意):
生物學家愛談「生態」:最高的橡樹之所以長得高,並非只因種子夠堅硬,也因為無樹遮光、泥土豐厚、無兔咬食、無人砍伐。我們皆知成功者種子堅實,但
這次出片的滿意好少,沒法,200真的難找東西拍,一來目標又沒鎖定,二來,都是第一次用,測試性質,有機會侮辱了這一支mamiya的銘鏡。
白色的長鏡,接在mamiya 645 pro tl機身上的注目度可謂100%。不過真的重,手震呀.
It's slowly become obvious to me that one of the mistakes with the'add a comment' form here on WanderingThoughts is that it doesn'tshow you the entry and existing comments. I know, a while back I thought that this was a good idea, but I'vechanged my mind since then; it's a design mistake.
Why I know this is pretty simple; I base it on personal experience.Whenever I write a comment myself, I invariably wind up with two windowsopen
In hindsight, it is somewhat peculiar that I spent a considerable timeusing Fedora 11 with a broken Flash setup instead of seriously lookinginto the situation. What happened is that I made a simple assumption: Iassumed that Flash and the associated infrastructure needed to run it ona 64-bit machine were second class citizens, looked down on and basicallyunsupported.
If I'd assumed that Fedora wouldn't leave Flash broken on 64-bitmachines, then it being broken on my machine was clearly