這是一篇我給 《明報》 寫的稿件,刊於 2007 年 4 月 15 日「星期日生活 – In Internet」版 。文章被編輯修正過一些字眼,不過意思沒變,以下是原文。
網摘與 Blog
我們常說:這是資訊爆炸的年代。每日有成千上萬的新聞、分析、評論
這是一篇我給 《明報》 寫的稿件,刊於 2007 年 4 月 15 日「星期日生活 – In Internet」版 。文章被編輯修正過一些字眼,不過意思沒變,以下是原文。
我們常說:這是資訊爆炸的年代。每日有成千上萬的新聞、分析、評論
網摘
Blog
Presented in the traditional illustrated form:
# chkconfig ntpd || echo not runningnot running# chkconfig --add ntpd# chkconfig ntpd || echo not runningnot running
I like Red Hat's chkconfig , but its --add option is so badlymisnamed it winds up irritating me half the time I use it. Oneindication of how bad it is is that the chkconfig manpage needs touse a paragraph to half explain it, and the explanation is exceedinglytechnical.
Part of the problem is that chkconfig is
This week, we:
This is about the same volume as last week .The per day table fluctuates a fair bit, with a mid-week peak as usual
I ran into this over this about a year ago, but I got reminded of ittoday:
Regardless of what interface a service is bound to, its outgoingpackets are going out through the interface that the default routesits on.
(Or the route to the specific destination.)
The only packets that are guaranteed to go out the same interface theycame in on are those from sources on that interface's local networks.
This would have bit me hard a year ago if we'd had more load on