早陣子參加了人山人海的擁抱綠色和平音樂會,玩了一首歌咁大把,但係,都足夠我緊張了好幾日。
當晚,阿Vee solo唱燕尾蝶,我在旁邊用我買了成年有多但卻沒怎玩過的Wind Synthesizer,製造電子聲效。
排練第一天,這東西很不聽話,頻頻
The simplistic reason is that only Atom feeds have a distinction betweenthe date an entry was published and the date it was most recentlyupdated. But as far as I know, even fairly deeply Atom aware syndicationfeed readers don't try to do anything much with the field; insteadthey look for changes in the entry's text.
One reason to not use it for much is that the Atom specification is fuzzy about when it getsupdated. The specification says that it is only the time of thelast significant
I really wish that the authors of mail transport agents would give mean actual language to program the behavior of their mailers. Well, notthe low-level behavior; what I want is a high-level language I canuse to cleanly write out the logic of what should happen to messages,the sequence of checks and actions and destinations that a particularmessage should go through.
I feel that our message flow logic is not particularly complicated, when written out directly . The problem is that as far as I can
This week, we:
This is about the same volume as last week .We continue to have a lot of spam zombies hitting us, but this week they
I've written about my unhappiness with partial entry syndication feeds before . Another limitation of partial feedsthat only struck me recently is that you may well get no sign that anentry has been updated after you've read it.
With a decent feed reader, any change to the text of an entry in thefeed that you've already read gets flagged. With full entries in thefeed, this means that updates get flagged. However, with a partialentry the update may well be made to stuff that
早陣子參加了人山人海的擁抱綠色和平音樂會,玩了一首歌咁大把,但係,都足夠我緊張了好幾日。
當晚,阿Vee solo唱燕尾蝶,我在旁邊用我買了成年有多但卻沒怎玩過的Wind Synthesizer,製造電子聲效。
排練第一天,這東西很不聽話,頻頻