松山研一X根岸祟一XKrauser二世
A bash irritation: mutable history
Here's one of those little things that irritate me about bash ,or more specifically its command line editing: its command historyis (sometimes) mutable. Under at least some circumstances, you canoverwrite a command that is in your history by going back to it (withsearch or cursor up) and editing it again. When you do this, the oldversion of the command is gone permanently; if you cursor back to itagain, you see your freshly edited version.
(This doesn't seem
失敗,及其意義——《長江七號》的一種讀法
(刪節版刊週一星島。世上最慢的影評寫作之一。寫好寄給編輯後,看到另一篇文章,本想過修改一下,但後來還是算了。對話其實可以低調。「 如今的情勢正演變為只有混得好的人才能殺出香港 」大概確是行情;我想起呂大樂
隱藏的仇恨
The 'Add Comments' problem
There is one significant imperfection in my effort to give commentreaders as much context as possible : the 'AddComments' link itself is easily accessible without having read anycomments. The problem with this is that the people who are leavingcomments are exactly the people you most want to have all of thecontext.
The obvious thing to do is to only put the 'add comment' link on thebottom of the page that has all of the comments, so people have toat least scroll past the existing comments to
Why I organize comments on WanderingThoughts the way I do
DWiki has a pretty simple way of displaying comments; all comments ona single page, which also has the main entry. There's a lot of moresophisticated comment handling systems, like LiveJournal and Slashdot,and I won't deny that part of why DWiki is simple is that simple is less code . But part of it is deliberate,because it's all about the context.
Specifically, I want people who read comments to have as much contextas possible, which means that I want them to
不學無術
拋磚引玉:
.第10宮一顆星都沒有,於
我的笨蛋表哥
“Cousins are dangerous partners.” 這是托爾斯泰在《戰爭與和平》裡的一句話,說的就是表哥與表妹一起長大,容易互生情愫,墮入情網。當時歐洲皇室流行貴族通婚,以鞏固權力,表親聯婚十分普遍。歐洲數百年都出產不了多少個
The difference between a SAN and a cluster filesystem
Both SANs and cluster filesystems have multiple machines talking tomultiple shared disks that all of them can see. The difference is thatSANs are designed for a single machine to talk to a given disk at atime, while cluster filesystems allow multiple machines to talk to thedisk at once.
Which raises the big question: why do you need cluster filesystemsat all? Why can't multiple systems share a single disk without doinganything special?
There's two problems with shared disks: caches and coordinatingupdates. These