Weekly spam summary on April 21st, 2007

This week, we:

  • got 12,325 messages from 286 different IP addresses.
  • handled 19,040 sessions from 1,240 different IP addresses.
  • received 170,841 connections from at least 51,674 different IP addresses.
  • hit a highwater of 17 connections being checked at once.

This is slightly up from last week , which just means it's within normal fluctuations. The per day table is flatter this time around:

DayConnectionsdifferent IPs
Sunday25,199+8,285
Monday28,318+7,887
Tuesday28,035+8,508
Wednesday26,202+8,425
Thursday24,601+7,856
Friday22,180+5,824
Saturday16,306+4,889

Kernel level packet filtering top ten:

Host/Mask           Packets   Bytes
68.168.78.0/24        34173   1640K adelphia.net
68.230.240.0/23       27081   1315K cox.net
205.152.59.0/24       12790    580K bellsouth.net
209.60.190.123        11106    519K
206.123.109.0/27      10994    603K
213.29.7.0/24         10704    642K centrum.cz
213.4.149.12           6001    312K
204.202.11.243         5451    269K
24.216.176.82          4535    218K
206.123.109.8          4315    237K

Volume is slightly up on last week , which is vaguely depressing. The 206.123.109.0/27 netblock deserves special mention; it is another tendril of the otcpicknews.com (aka otcpicks.com and many others) group, previously found slamming us from 72.249.13.64/26 last week . Evidently adding them to the kernel level blocks was a good idea.

  • 209.60.190.123 and 213.4.149.12 return from last week .
  • 204.202.11.243 kept trying to send us phish spam that had already tripped over our spamtraps.
  • 24.216.176.82 is a charter.com cablemodem or other dynamic IP address.
  • 206.123.109.8 ias part of 206.123.109.0/27, but we blocked it first so it gets a separate entry.

Connection time rejection stats:

  48381 total
  25951 dynamic IP
  16153 bad or no reverse DNS
   4951 class bl-cbl
    215 acceleratebiz.com
    191 class bl-dsbl
    133 qsnews.net
    116 class bl-pbl
     85 class bl-sbl
     77 class bl-njabl
     62 class bl-sdul
     23 cuttingedgemedia.com

The highest SBL source this week is SBL48694 with 13 hits, which is a known spam sending source that was listed at the end of March.

Seven of the top 30 most rejected IP addresses were rejected 100 times or more this week; the champion is 190.51.4.122 (1107 rejections, a speedy.com.ar IP address without good reverse DNS), followed closely by 76.187.221.186 (971 rejections, a rr.com cablemodem) and 86.135.179.47 (836 rejections, a btcentralplus.com dynamic machine of some description). Ten of the top 30 are currently in the CBL, one is in the SBL (213.154.87.161, in SBL21133 , listed April 18th 2005 for emitting way too much advance fee fraud spam), three are currently in bl.spamcop.net , twelve are in the PBL, and a grand total of 17 of the top 30 are in zen.spamhaus.org .

(Locally, 13 were rejected as 'dynamic IP', 11 were rejected for having bad or missing reverse DNS, 4 were rejected for being various places we don't talk to any more on account of spam, and two are on the DSBL.)

This week Hotmail had:

  • no messages accepted.
  • 2 messages rejected because they came from non-Hotmail email addresses.
  • 36 messages sent to our spamtraps.
  • 3 messages refused because their sender addresses had already hit our spamtraps.
  • 3 messages refused due to their origin IP address (one in the CBL, one in SBL33955 , an advance fee fraud spam source listing from October 24th 2005 (and it was sending through Hotmail back then), and one from saix.net/telkcom.co.za).

And the final numbers:

what# this week(distinct IPs)# last week(distinct IPs)
Bad HELO s7207594072
Bad bounces68225729

The leading source of bad HELO s is 203.90.78.101, with 96 rejections. The leading source of bad bounces was 012.net.il, followed by earthlink.net and videotron.ca; other bad bounces came from a random smattering of all over.

Bad bounces were sent to 23 different bad usernames this week. The leading target, with 39 attempts, was an old user account, long since removed; after that, with 6 attempts, comes our old friend noreply . Apart from that, almost all of the bounces went to things like OtisVentura , with a smattering of old local users.