Breaking ranks: China’s new journal publishing benchmarks to boost scientific soft power

Researchers examine semiconductor materials in a lab. A new scientific journal ranking system introduced by Beijing is intended as a “positive guide” to help elevate the work of the nation’s leading scientists. Photo: Xinhua

in Beijing and in Beijing

The National Science Library under the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) released an updated Journal Ranking Table in March.

The new ranking system covers around 22,000 journals across 21 major disciplines, sorting them into four tiers in each discipline, according to self-defined evaluation criteria.

This ranking is now a critical component of China’s research evaluation system. Many universities and research institutions use it to assess researcher output , evaluate promotions, and even determine whether doctoral students can graduate.
After a previous update to the ranking table in 2023, the latest publication was noteworthy, particularly after some established international top-tier journals were downgraded to the second tier. In contrast, domestic Chinese journals displayed impressive improvements, with some advancing to higher rankings.

In one instance, a well-regarded materials science journal with an impact factor of 9.6, according to the widely recognised Journal Citation Reports by Clarivate, was downgraded to the second tier. In another case, the Chinese Science Bulletin – a Chinese-language journal jointly sponsored by the CAS and the National Natural Science Foundation of China – with a modest impact factor of 1.1, was rated as a top-tier journal.