Hong Kong court quashes government decision to refuse permits to 2 Uber drivers

The High Court in Admiralty. Photo: Warton Li

A Hong Kong court has quashed a government decision to refuse hire car permits to two prospective Uber drivers seven years ago, rejecting authorities’ contentions that the move could open the floodgates for ride-hailing services and private vehicles to operate as “pseudo-taxis”.

In a written judgment handed down on Thursday, the High Court found that the commissioner for transport’s dismissal of two litigants’ requests for a permit in 2018 to be based on an “impracticable, illogical and unworkable” interpretation of the legal requirement that would likely render all first-time applications unsuccessful.

The court also dismissed the government’s argument that the legislature had only intended for taxis to provide personalised point-to-point journeys, ruling that it would effectively impose a categorical ban on ride-hailing operators and run contrary to authorities’ clear assurance that they would not be excluded from providing point-to-point services.

Mr Justice Russell Coleman ordered the Transport Tribunal to consider the matter afresh, but noted his ruling “would be practically determinative” of the applications for a permit in the applicants’ favour.

He stressed the judgment only concerned the correct interpretation of the law governing the issuance of hire car permits and not the government’s policy on e-hailing platforms.