Who watches Malaysia’s watchdog? Controversy over anti-corruption chief strains reform agenda

The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission building in Putrajaya, Malaysia. Photo: Shutterstock

In Malaysia , one question about corruption keeps being asked by the public no matter who is in power: who investigates the investigators?
Fresh allegations over the investments of the country’s top anti-corruption official have brought that conundrum back into sharp focus, with critics warning that trust in key institutions – and in Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim ’s reform promises – is on the line.

The controversy centres on Azam Baki, chief commissioner of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), after Bloomberg News alleged last week, citing corporate filings, that he held shares above limits set for civil servants. The outlet later published a separate investigation alleging that MACC officers had helped businessmen use the agency in corporate disputes – accusations the commission has rejected.

Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Chief Commissioner Azam Baki. Photo: SCMP
Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Chief Commissioner Azam Baki. Photo: SCMP

Meanwhile, Azam denied wrongdoing and said he was ready to cooperate with the investigation, welcoming a “transparent, independent and objective process” to establish facts “based on evidence and in accordance with the principles of justice and the rule of law”.

He added: “A culture of accountability cannot be selective or seasonal.”