
想當年,時為1979年之唔係30年前,這部銀藍色的卡式帶Sony Walkman TPS-L2 ,試問邊個靚仔唔恨有番部?
我真希望Sony能夠復刻這部元祖Walkman,但要將她變成擁有和iPod功能一樣的MP3 Player,中間的卡式帶窗口變成LED mon,有餅卡式帶晌
There's a certain perception that Fedora is the beta-quality testbedfor Red Hat Enterprise (to condense a comment from an earlier entry ), and this is why you shouldn't put it on anymachine you care about. This isn't the case, but I think people wind upwith this perception because they hear the accurate suggestion that youprobably shouldn't put it on servers or production machines unless youreally know what you're doing.
Fedora is supposed to be (and by and

想當年,時為1979年之唔係30年前,這部銀藍色的卡式帶Sony Walkman TPS-L2 ,試問邊個靚仔唔恨有番部?
我真希望Sony能夠復刻這部元祖Walkman,但要將她變成擁有和iPod功能一樣的MP3 Player,中間的卡式帶窗口變成LED mon,有餅卡式帶晌
In a previous entry I made an offhandcomment that diskless clients still needed a separate / filesystemfor each client. This is true for how diskless clients were generallyimplemented, but technically not true in general; it's possible to builda diskless client environment with even a shared root directory.
The truth is that most of the contents of / are common between allmachines; there is just not that much system-specific information inthe root filesystem, especially if your diskless machines were generic(which they usually were

|
| From for blog |
Right now, there are a fair number of websites that assume that everyonecan have their own IP address and thus, if there are two connectionsfrom the same IP address that they should be considered to be the sameperson for things like load limiting, anti-cheating systems, and so on.This assumption is already false in the corporate world and has been forsome time, but it has survived reasonably well for 'consumer'-orientedstuff, because it has tended to be true of general user ISPs.